When I first started speaking about the deception of new age spirituality I was often accused of being divisive. It bothered me, because the very people who had been speaking truth suddenly wanted me to be silent, to keep my spiritual beliefs to myself.
And at the heart of it is a big misunderstanding of what causes division.
It’s not our opinions that cause division, but the emotional baggage that comes with opinions; the ways we express them, the ways we disagree. The ways we let our emotions get into our speech in negative ways.
As the book of James says about the tongue ‘it is a restless evil, full of deadly poison.’
When is the time to speak, and the time to stay silent?
The book of James really convicted me when I first read it, on how actually sometimes the best course of action is to stay silent.
This past week the theme of speaking truth and when and where it is appropriate to speak truth has been repeatedly drawing my attention.
I have had to think carefully and reassess the ways that I speak truth, and in what format.
In the internet age it is so challenging, when we have the ease of quickly typing up a comment and clicking send before we even have time to think through properly.
How Satan must love that ability to create war, and division faster than the speed of light.
And yet what Satan intended for evil God uses for good.
While Satan adores division, I think he also loves it when people are united under a lie.
After all, isn’t what the antichrist kingdom will be, people united under a massive lie, while there are a few outliers trying to proclaim the truth?
There have been times in my walk with the Lord, that I’ve wanted to warn other Christians about the dangers of something; be it contemplative prayer (an Eastern meditation practise that as infiltrated some churches), or yoga (which many Christians have no idea is a spiritual practise.)
I’ve been pleasantly surprised at the openness I’ve had from editors to write about these topics, and to consider different opinions. I love the fact that in the Christian world there are debates, and conversations, where differences of opinion can be heard. For example I recently listened to this conversation with ex. psychic Jenn Nizza and Pete Laws, about whether Christians should watch horror films.
I think it’s wonderful that these debates can take place, that we shouldn’t feel afraid of the opposing side, when each side is getting an equal airing.
Sometimes however there are people who disagree who throw the ‘divisive’ label around, and it feels as if it’s because they want to silence the conversation.
Debates are weaponised so that people’s emotions get sparked.
Yet, if we love truth, we must be careful not to shut down conversation.
Grace and truth. Words aren’t always perfectly delivered, at the right place or the right time.
But it’s up to us, to take responsibility for our emotions, rather than add them as fuel to the fiery conversation, in an attempt to burn it to the ground.
I don’t think the ‘divisiveness’ is that we air our opinions but what our opinion is. Ie that only Christ is the way and that all other spiritual beliefs are therefore, in effect, wrong.
NA beliefs on the other hand allow anything. Anything goes. The Wild West of spirituality. Apart from our faith as we are saying theirs is wrong and they are saying ours is wrong because we are saying theirs is wrong. If that makes sense.
My friend who is coming to Christ is struggling with this ‘spiritual elitism’, as he called it, as he knows many good people in the NA, and in general, who also do good works, as do I. He struggles, and I fully understand this, that a Christian will have eternal life whereas these good people won’t.
I don’t have any good answer to tell him on this as to why this is fair. I’m not sure there is one?
If I’m honest, I probably struggle with this too, but I tend to bypass it as I am stronger in my faith. But I really shouldn’t and would love to know good answers on this. When speaking to my pastor on this subject he didn’t have one apart from, that’s the way it is, that’s the truth. And I do believe that truth is binary - by definition there can only be one. But that is clearly a bitter pill for those on the other side to swallow.
I haven’t watched the debate you linked to, just a few minutes, but isn’t that a debate between Christian’s who already have the same faith? If so, that’s not a reflection of a debate with a new ager for the reason given above. It’s relatively easy to speak to fellow Christian’s about doctrine differences because all Christian’s would agree on the fundamental of the single line - I am the way the truth and the life.